Torna  sui  tuoi  passi Torna  alla  home  della  Rete

Rete Telematica per l'innovazione didattica
delle Scuole di Roma e provincia

 

Online asynchronous peer tutoring experience

Paola Ebranati, MA Psychology – Liceo Italiano in Istanbul – Istanbul - Turkey

Brunella Pellegrini, MA Physics – ITIS Albert Einstein – Rome - Italy

Case description

The following case is an application of  ITC – assisted cooperative learning as designed and implemented in an inter-class activity time-lapsed over  4 months within the SCOUT project.

The theoretical framework is rooted in constructivism and the aim of the activity is to attempt to transfer learning behaviours typically situated in cooperative groups to a  group of learners who have never been exposed to any form of cooperative learning.

Such transfer of  learning behaviours is to take place exclusively telematically, i.e. through ICT.

Two parallel classes  are involved in the study: one consisting of 18 students aged 18, (16 boys and 2 girls) from IT IS Albert Einstein, Technical School for electronics and telecommunications based in Rome (curriculum in Electronics), and another class of 25, 18-year-olders, (5 males and 20 females) from Liceo Italiano in Istanbul, a secondary school for General Sciences and Humanities (curriculum in Turkish and Mathematics). This latter is an Italian government-funded school established in Turkey as early as 1888 and holds the status of private school for the Turkish Government. 87% of the students are Turkish citizens and receive tuition partly in Italian and partly in Turkish. Italian is a cross-curricular language and is taught as a second language, together with English. The pages devoted to the description of the activities are at:

http://www.liceoitaliano.net/didanet2003/interazioni.htm#0

 

Aim of the activity

Transfer cooperative behaviours in learning from an experienced group of students to an inexperienced group of the same age and of different socio-cultural and curricular background. This activity  is being carried out in the frame of the DidaNet project, headed by IT IS Albert Einstein in Rome, which is in its turn boxed in Pitagoras

                                                      

End outcome of the activity:

sets of simple web-based hypermedia on  the following content areas:

-         food

-         learning

-         technology – man-machine interfaces

 

Actors

Organizers & Head tutors

Two teachers: one in charge of class 4B from Einstein, one in charge of  4C from Liceo Italiano.

Group - coordinators

6 pairs: each pair made up of a Turkish student and an Italian student

Paired groups

6 mixed Italian –Turkish groups were formed, each headed by two coordinator-students, one Turkish and one Italian, according to the map below:

 

Work organization: group formation

Liceo ItalianoTurkish groups

Coordinating students

ITIS Italian groups

Seda Ungeldi 4C f (4C f)

Dilek Dogan (f)

Deniz Ozubek ( f

Serli Cakilciyan (4C f)

 

Kamil Stanisz- Kemal Sozer

       Liceo1-E1

Christian Ceccarelli

Emanuele Falcetti

Kamil Stanisz

Domenico Berardi

Ali Tirali (m)

Esra Kivilcim 4C f

Tuba Bilgen(4C f)

  Seda Ocal

 Roberta Caravillani- Seda Ocal (4c f)  

Liceo2-E2

Daniele Proietti

David Bucossi

Valentina Scozzari

Roberta Caravillani

Hande Yazicioglu 4C f

Aytul  Cakiroglu 4C f

Sena Arcak (4C) f

Strazzera -Deniz Degirmenderli  (f)  

Liceo3-E3

Strazzera

Politano’

Amatulli

Jasemin Demirsoz

Peren Kıstak

Nazli Nakipoglu 4C f

Emrah Oztel -Luca Livi  

Liceo4-E4

Marco Casalino

Luca Livi

Riccardo Cappellano

Kucukkay Gozde 4C f

Sinem Kuscu 4C f  

Sinan Sahinler(m)

 Simone Giarlini -Begum Budak 

Liceo5-E5

Danilo Tiberia

Simone Giarlini

Giulio Fazzi

Didem Altinay 4C f

Chiara Caffiero 4C f

Jasemin Aydogmus 4C f

Emilio Piergentili Gunbike Dilman ( f)

Liceo6-E6

Emilio Piergentili

Alessio Califano

Fabrizio Quarta

Materials and Methods

In order to justify  the hypothesis of a marked difference between the groups as regard to their concept of  learning, a 27-item interval-scale questionnaire was designed, whose items were statements on learning viewed as part of peer cooperation (constructivistic view) randomly mixed with statements on learning viewed as a teacher-centred product (behavioristic view). Both classes (the Turkish and the Italian) were administered the questionnaire in order to ascertain which views appeared to be most common in each of the groups. As expected, the Turkish students appeared to view learning as the result of direct instruction, imitation, repetition, memorization and total compliance with top-down orders and requests from the teacher alone, whereas the Italian students seemed to exhibit a more flexible attitude, whereby learning is viewed as a cooperative ongoing process, with teachers seen as a variable of a process which may take place mostly in relationships, confrontation and exchange of ideas.

A second checklist of  technology-handling skills was made by the two teachers.

Checklist of main differences in terms of: communication – production – technical skills between the Turkish class and the Italian class, as assessed by the two head teachers:

Yes = relatively present     NO= entirely missing

Communication skills

 

ITIS A. Einstein – Italian groups

Liceo Italiano – Turkish  groups

Previous experience of cooperative work

 

  yes

no

Ability to acknowledge and  respect a peer student as a  tutor

 

  yes

Yes, only if  the teacher supervises and approves the tutor

Ability to  negotiate and collectively choose a topic of interest for study purposes

 

  yes

no

Ability to follow a collectively negotiated schedule

 

  yes

Yes, only if the teacher is controlling the process

Ability to keep a regular eye on the mail interactions and checks new messages autonomously

 

  yes

No,  students expect the teacher to give orders and to keep a steady eye on the incoming msg

Ability to keep focused on the objective

 

  yes

No, students expect the teacher to tell them what to do every other minute.

Ability to execute assignments given via distance communication by a peer  in charge of a teaching sequence.

 

  yes

NO

Ability to comply with netiquette

 

  yes

Yes, only if teacher tells what to do and how to write

Production skills

 

 

 

Information retrieval skills

 

yes

yes

Classification skills

 

yes

no

Concept-mapping skills

 

yes

no

Interface designing skills

 

yes

no

Content re-writing and modifying skills

 

yes

yes –only upon a model set by the teacher

Formatting and text-engineering skills

 

yes

yes –only upon a model set by the teacher

Software handling skills

 

 

 

Word-processing skills

 

  yes

yes

FTP software usage

 

  yes

no

Graphic design skills

 

  yes

no

Yahoo groups functions handling skills

 

  yes

yes

Web-hosting service uploading and dowloading skills

 

  yes

no

p://it.groups.yahoo.com/group/3d4d4c/

The challenge of the activity was to see whether at least some of the behaviours and skills present in the Italian group could be somewhat be induced/transferred in the Turkish group, using distance cooperation.

Models used: cooperative learning with embedded peer-tutoring organized according to what we termed: “table tennis” strategy.

Environment: //it.groups.yahoo.com/group/3d4d4c/

Since the Turkish students were not familiar either with cooperative activities, or with hypertext building, or with concept-mapping, we thought it would not be advisable to plunge them directly into an activity which per se required a high level of autonomy. Therefore  a number of structured phases were designed, gradually progressing from teacher-centred assignments to more autonomous activities. The students would therefore pass from complying to the teacher to acknowledging the authority of a peer-coordinator, to negotiating solutions with their peers on an equal opportunity basis.

Phases:

November 2002

December 2002

Mid-february 2003

March 2003

April 2003

1.Planning

Backchannel mails between head teachers discussing how to plan the study

(IT IS teacher teaches electronics component design, Liceo Italiano’s teacher teaches English culture and literature)

the two teachers mutually backchannel constantly in order to negotiate the best way to form paired groups.

Questionnaires are cooperatively designed, exchanged and administered independently to the two classes.

2.The two classes work separately on the selection of two content areas and of  omologous sub-topics  in line with their respective curricula.

6. phase of peer-tutoring: group coordinators of the Italian groups address directly to the Turkish coordinators and send simple information on concept mapping and hypertexts

10. a second round of peer-tutoring will involve the Italian coordinators instructing their Turkish counterparts how to build linked pages.

3. table-tennis starts with the Turkish head teacher starting a hosting place for online future interaction on yahoo.groups and webbing up a page with pictures of the Turkish group

7. Turkish coordinators study the materials uploaded by their Italian counterparts onto the file area of  yahoo group, make copies for their Turkish peers for these latter to study them.

11. Each Turkish coordinator is expected to explain the instructions to his group and actually help each member to link his/her pages together. Any questions or problem points will be discussed on the list.

4. the Italian head teacher in turn webs up a page with the picture of the Italian class

8. each Turkish member of each group will elaborate a concept map. The Turkish coordinator of each group will upload the maps onto the specific folder in the file area (Liceo1-E1 ex.)

12. The Turkish coordinators will collect the hypertexts from their respective group members and will upload them onto the file area of  the yahoo group.

5. basic rules on how to sign up in the yahoo group are explained to both classes.

A first round of introductory messages took place. IT IS students sign up as groups, with the following names: E1 – E2- E3-E4-E5-E6

Each group posts an introductory message with self-presentations.

A second round of introductory replies follows by the 6 groups of the Liceo: Liceo1 to E1, Liuceo2 to E2, Liceo 3 to E3 etc.

9. The Italian coordinators will retrieve the maps and will discuss possible changes and/or ameliorations. They will feedback their counterparts on the list.

 

13. the Italian coordinators are in charge of  downloading the linked hypertexts (in word format), distribute them to their respective group members who will web up a small show case for the hypertexts.

14. a real time web-cam session might be scheduled for final mutual feedback.

A post-activity re-administration of the questionnaire will be carried out only on the Turkish students to see whether any change has occurred with respect to their concept of learning.

Additions

Topics covered

IT IS Einstein class curriculum

Overlapping main content areas

Liceo Italiano curriculum

Electronics

Science

Information Technology

Shared areas

Food – technology - mind

Italian Language

English Literature

History - Humanities

Group: Liceo1-E1                                                        food&health            Food in Victorian England

 

Group Liceo2-E2

Apprendimento e malattie legate alla nutrizione

Technology in the Victorian period

Group Liceo3-E3

mental health

Mental hospitals in the Victorian Period

Group Liceo4-E4

Periferiche-tecnologie

 

history of AI - geniuses and inventors

Group Liceo5-E5

Nutrition - transgenic food

 

history of genetics

Group Liceo6-E6

MEMORIE ARTIFICIALI

 

HUMAN MEMORY

 

 

Graphic representation of the model

Phase 1

 

 

Phase 2

 

Indietro  Home Didattica Rete Lab-NetContatti ArchivioPercorsi  |  Glossario Mappa ed HELP

[percorsofile.htm]